Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of the Corticosteroid-Sparing Effects of Immunoglobulin in Myasthenia Gravis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease characterized by dysfunction at the neuromuscular junction. Treatment frequently includes corticosteroids (CSs) and IV immunoglobulin (IVIG). This study was conducted to determine whether immune globulin (human), 10% caprylate/chromatography purified (IGIV-C) could facilitate CS dose reduction in CS-dependent patients with MG. METHODS: In this randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial, CS-dependent patients with MG (Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Class II-Iva; AChR+) received a loading dose of 2 g/kg IGIV-C over 2 days (maximum 80 g/d) or placebo at week 0 (baseline). Maintenance doses (1 g/kg IGIV-C or placebo) were administered every 3 weeks through week 36. Tapering of CS was initiated at week 9 and continued through week 36 unless the patient worsened (quantitative MG score ≥4 points from baseline). CS doses were increased (based on the current CS dose) in patients who worsened. Patients were withdrawn if worsening failed to improve within 6 weeks or if a second CS increase was required. The primary efficacy end point (at week 39) was a ≥50% reduction in CS dose. Secondary and safety end points were assessed throughout the study and follow-up (weeks 42 and 45). The study results and full protocol are available at clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02473965. RESULTS: The primary end point (≥50% reduction in CS dose) showed no significant difference between the IGIV-C treatment (60.0% of patients) and placebo (63.3%). There were no significant differences for secondary end points. Safety data indicated that IGIV-C was well tolerated. DISCUSSION: In this study, IGIV-C was not more effective than placebo in reducing daily CS dose. These results suggest that the effects of IGIV-C and CS are not synergistic and may be mechanistically different. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: The trial was registered on clinicaltrialsregister.eu (EudraCT #: 2013-005099-17) and clinicaltrials.gov (identifier NCT02473965). CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that IVIG infusions in adult patients with MG do not increase the percentage of patients achieving a ≥50% reduction in corticosteroid dose compared with placebo.

A Multi­Center, Open­Label, Single­Arm Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety and Tolerability of IGSC 20% in Subjects with Primary Immunodeficiency.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this phase 3 study was to evaluate the efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), and safety of Immune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human), 20% Caprylate/Chromatography Purified (IGSC 20%) in patients with primary immunodeficiency (PI). METHODS: Immunoglobulin treatment-experienced subjects with PI received 52 weeks of IGSC 20% given weekly at the same dose as the subject's previous IgG regimen (DAF 1:1); the minimum dose was 100 mg/kg/week. The primary endpoint was serious bacterial infections (SBIs [null vs alternative hypothesis: SBI rate per person per year ≥ 1 vs < 1]). IgG subclasses and specific pathogen antibody levels were also measured. RESULTS: Sixty-one subjects (19 children [≤ 12 years], 10 adolescents [> 12-16 years], and 32 adults) were enrolled. The rate of SBIs per person per year was 0.017. The 1-sided 99% upper confidence limit was 0.036 (< 1), and the null hypothesis was rejected. The rate of hospitalization due to infection per person per year was 0.017 (2-sided 95% confidence interval: 0.008-0.033) overall. The mean trough total IgG concentrations were comparable to the previous IgG replacement regimen. The average of the individual mean trough ratios (IGSC 20%:previous regimen) was 1.078 (range: 0.83-1.54). The average steady-state mean trough IgG concentrations were 947.64 and 891.37 mg/dL, respectively. Seven subjects had serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); none was drug-related. The rate of all TEAEs, including local infusion site reactions, during 3045 IGSC 20% infusions was 0.135. Most TEAEs were mild or moderate. CONCLUSIONS: IGSC 20% demonstrated efficacy and good safety and tolerability in subjects with PI.

Polyvalent Human Immune Globulin: A Prospective, Open-Label Study Assessing Anti-Hepatitis A Virus (HAV) Antibody Levels, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety in HAV-Seronegative Healthy Subjects.

BACKGROUND: Analytical data suggesting that immunoglobulin given intramuscularly (IGIM) may have reduced protection against hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection led to an update in the recommended IGIM dose (0.2 ml/kg). METHODS: This prospective, open-label, single-arm clinical study evaluated whether a single 0.2 ml/kg dose of IGIM provided protective levels of anti-HAV antibodies (≥ 10 mIU/ml for up to 60 days) in HAV-seronegative healthy adults. RESULTS: Of the 28 subjects enrolled and dosed, 26 (93%) completed the study. Mean uncorrected anti-HAV antibody titers peaked at 109 mIU/ml on day 5 and stayed above 10 mIU/ml through day 60 (N = 26). The mean uncorrected anti-HAV antibody titers had a median Tmax of 95.33 h, a mean Cmax of 118 mIU/ml, and a mean observed Thalf of 63.3 days; baseline-corrected titers had a median Tmax of 95.33 h, a mean Cmax of 114 mIU/ml, and a mean observed Thalf of 47.1 days (N = 27). All subjects (28/28) experienced at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), with a total of 83 TEAEs reported; none was serious, and 96% (80/83) resolved without sequelae. Most (63%) events judged definitely and possibly related to study treatment involved localized pain due to intramuscular injections. There were no serious adverse events and no deaths or discontinuations due to TEAEs. CONCLUSIONS: A single 0.2 ml/kg dose of IGIM provided protective anti-HAV levels for at least 60 days, with acceptable safety and tolerability profiles in healthy subjects. Uncorrected and baseline-corrected pharmacokinetic findings were similar and consistent with the corresponding sampling points in previous research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier, NCT03351933.

Myasthenia gravis: Historical achievements and the "golden age" of clinical trials.

Since the death of Chief Opechankanough >350 years ago, the myasthenia gravis (MG) community has gained extensive knowledge about MG and how to treat it. This review highlights key milestones in the history of treatment and discusses the current "golden age" of clinical trials. Although originally thought by many clinicians to be a disorder of hysteria and fluctuating weakness without observable cause, MG is one the most understood autoimmune neurologic disorders. However, studying it in clinical trials has been challenging due to the fluctuating nature of the medical condition which impacts MG clinical outcomes. Clinical trials must also account for the possibility of a placebo effect. Because MG is a rare incurable autoimmune disorder, it limits the number of potential patients available to participate in clinical trials. In the last 15 years, however, significant progress has been made with MG randomized clinical trials, resulting in a new drug (eculizumab) for physicians' treatment repertoire and an old technique (thymectomy) confirmed effective for MG. Some of the therapies (eg, thymectomy, corticosteroids, plasma exchange, and intravenous immunoglobulin [IVIg]) have survived the test of time. Others (eg, eculizumab and neonatal Fc receptor inhibitor) are novel and hold promise.

A Phase 3 Multicenter, Prospective, Open-Label Efficacy and Safety Study of Immune Globulin (Human) 10% Caprylate/Chromatography Purified in Patients with Myasthenia Gravis Exacerbations.

BACKGROUND: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder affecting neuromuscular transmission. Exacerbations may involve increasing bulbar weakness and/or sudden respiratory failure, both of which can be critically disabling. Management of MG exacerbations includes plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG); they are equally effective, but patients experience fewer side effects with IVIG. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of immune globulin caprylate/chromatography purified (IGIV-C) in subjects with MG exacerbations. METHODS: This prospective, open-label, non-controlled 28-day clinical trial was conducted in adults with MG Foundation of America class IVb or V status. Subjects received IGIV-C 2 g/kg over 2 consecutive days (1 g/kg/day) and were assessed for efficacy/safety on Days 7, 14, 21, and 28. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from Baseline in quantitative MG (QMG) score to Day 14. Secondary endpoints of clinical response, Baseline to Day 14, included at least a 3-point decrease in QMG and MG Composite and a 2-point decrease in MG-activities of daily living (MG-ADL). RESULTS: Forty-nine subjects enrolled. The change in QMG score at Day 14 was significant (p < 0.001) in the Evaluable (-6.4, n = 43) and Safety (-6.7, n = 49) populations. Among evaluable subjects, Day 14 response rates were 77, 86, and 88% for QMG, MG Composite, and MG-ADL, respectively. IGIV-C showed good tolerability with no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that IGIV-C was effective, safe, and well tolerated in the treatment of MG exacerbations.

WGS to determine the extent of Clostridioides difficile transmission in a high incidence setting in North Wales in 2015.

OBJECTIVES: Rates of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection (CDI) are higher in North Wales than elsewhere in the UK. We used WGS to investigate if this is due to increased healthcare-associated transmission from other cases. METHODS: Healthcare and community C. difficile isolates from patients across North Wales (February-July 2015) from glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH)-positive faecal samples underwent WGS. Data from patient records, hospital management systems and national antimicrobial use surveillance were used. RESULTS: Of the 499 GDH-positive samples, 338 (68%) were sequenced and 299 distinct infections/colonizations were identified, 229/299 (77%) with toxin genes. Only 39/229 (17%) toxigenic isolates were related within ≤2 SNPs to ≥1 infections/colonizations from a previously sampled patient, i.e. demonstrated evidence of possible transmission. Independent predictors of possible transmission included healthcare exposure in the last 12 weeks (P = 0.002, with rates varying by hospital), infection with MLST types ST-1 (ribotype 027) and ST-11 (predominantly ribotype 078) compared with all other toxigenic STs (P < 0.001), and cephalosporin exposure in the potential transmission recipient (P = 0.02). Adjusting for all these factors, there was no additional effect of ward workload (P = 0.54) or failure to meet cleaning targets (P = 0.25). Use of antimicrobials is higher in North Wales compared with England and the rest of Wales. CONCLUSIONS: Levels of transmission detected by WGS were comparable to previously described rates in endemic settings; other explanations, such as variations in antimicrobial use, are required to explain the high levels of CDI. Cephalosporins are a risk factor for infection with C. difficile from another infected or colonized case.

Physician derived versus administrative data in identifying surgical complications. Fact versus Fiction.

BACKGROUND: Administrative data are widely used as determinants of surgical quality. We compared surgical complications identified in a structured surgical review to coding and billing data of over a 19-month period. METHODS: A retrospective review of monthly morbidity and mortality conference reports was compared to a report over the same time period generated from hospital coding and billing data. RESULTS: 807 sequential operative procedures were included. Physician derived data compared to administrative data identified a complication of any severity in 205 (25.4%) versus 111 (13.8%) cases (r = 0.39), and major complications in 68 (8.4%) versus 46 (5.7%) cases (r = 0.36). Review of the administrative data regarding major complications identified 80 false negatives, 52 false positives, and 38 true positive designations. Overall sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy for administrative data in identifying major complications was 0.32, 0.99, 0.42, 0.99, and 0.99. CONCLUSIONS: The correlation between physician determined and administrative data with regard to identifying surgical complications is poor. Administrative data are insensitive and lack positive predictive value.

Measles antibody trough levels after treatment with immunoglobulin products and predicted levels assuming lower measles antibody specifications.

BACKGROUND: Widespread vaccination against measles has resulted in decreasing measles antibody levels in human immune globulin (IG) products. As levels continue to decline, it needs to be determined whether the release specifications for measles antibody levels in IG products can be lowered and still provide protection against infection for patients who receive IG treatment for primary immunodeficiency disease. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Trough level measles neutralizing antibodies were measured in 10 pediatric patients with primary immunodeficiency disease (ages 2-16) treated with IG administered both by intravenous and subcutaneous infusion. The results were used to model worst-case (lowest) serum measles antibody levels in two cases: 1) the current case with intravenous dosage at 300 mg/kg at a measles antibody level of 0.48× Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Reference 176 and 2) a future case with intravenous dosage at 400 mg/kg and 0.30× Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Reference 176. RESULTS: Serum trough measles neutralizing antibody levels were an average of 11-fold or greater above minimum protective levels for immunocompetent individuals of 0.12 IU/mL in both the intravenous and subcutaneous phases of the study. Modeling using both the current worst-case dose and future case shows average levels for IG intravenous/subcutaneous infusion of 3.9/4.8- and 3.2/4.0-fold above 0.12 IU/mL for the two cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: Lowering the measles antibody level specification to 0.30× Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Reference 176 in IG products will still provide trough serum antibody levels against measles infection of greater than 0.12 IU/mL when dosed at 400 mg/kg or higher.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Subcutaneous Immune Globulin Injection (Human), 10 % Caprylate/Chromatography Purified (GAMUNEX®-C) in Pediatric Patients with Primary Immunodeficiency Disease.

PURPOSE: This phase 4, multicenter, open-labeled, single-sequence, crossover study in pediatric patients (ages 2 to 16) with primary immunodeficiency disease (PID) evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability for subcutaneously (SC) administered 10 % caprylate/chromatography purified human immune globulin injection (IGIV-C, GAMUNEX®) compared with intravenously (IV) administered IGIV-C. METHODS: This study included a screening phase, run-in phase (where required), IV treatment phase, SC treatment phase, and end of study/early termination visit. Eligible patients receiving a stable dose of IGIV-C entered into the IV phase to receive two IV infusions of IGIV-C (200-600 mg/kg per infusion) every 3-4 weeks. The weekly SC dose of IGIV-C was calculated using a conversion factor of 1.37 times the prior IV dose. RESULTS: Twelve subjects between the ages of 2 and 16 years participated in the clinical study with the median age being 11 years old. The adjusted weekly mean AUC0-τ,IV was 216,873.7 h*mg/dL for the IV phase versus a mean AUC0-τ,SC of 230,830.0 h*mg/dL for the SC phase. The mean (range) C trough was 997.2 (784-1320) mg/dL in the IV phase and 1325.0 (1077-1690) mg/dL in the SC phase. During the SC phase, 100.0 % of the patients (n = 11) experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) that were local infusion reactions and 9 patients (81.8 %) had TEAEs that were non-infusion site reactions. The majority of TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity. CONCLUSION: In pediatric patients with PID, SC-administered IGIV-C provides comparable overall serum exposure to total IgG to that produced by IV-administered IGIV-C. We have concluded that weekly SC administration of 10 % IGIV-C based on a dose conversion factor of 1.37 is safe and well-tolerated in pediatric patients with PID. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01465958. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01465958?term=NCT01465958.&rank=1.

Inhaled alpha1-proteinase inhibitor therapy in patients with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled alpha1-proteinase inhibitor (PI) is known to reduce neutrophil elastase burden in some patients with CF. This phase 2a study was designed to test inhaled Alpha-1 HC, a new aerosolized alpha1-PI formulation, in CF patients. METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study and evaluated the safety of 100 or 200mg of inhaled Alpha-1 HC once daily for 3 weeks in subjects with CF. Thirty adult subjects were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive Alpha-1 HC or placebo. RESULTS: Drug delivery was confirmed by a dose-dependent increase in the sputum alpha1-PI. Seven (20.0%) of the 35 adverse events in the 100-mg dose group, 3 (13.0%) of 23 in the 200-mg dose group, and 4 (14.3%) of 28 in the placebo group were drug-related in these subjects. One serious adverse event occurred in 1 subject within each group. CONCLUSIONS: Alpha-1 HC inhalation was safe and well tolerated.

SPARTA clinical trial design: exploring the efficacy and safety of two dose regimens of alpha1-proteinase inhibitor augmentation therapy in alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency.

BACKGROUND: Alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is an underdiagnosed genetic disorder that results in early-onset emphysema due to low serum levels of alpha1-proteinase inhibitor (alpha1-PI), leading to increased activity of tissue-damaging neutrophil elastase. Clinical outcomes of AATD may be improved by administering alpha1-PI augmentation therapy. Here, we describe the design of the ongoing Study of ProlAstin-c Randomized Therapy with Alpha-1 augmentation (SPARTA), a phase 3 trial designed to evaluate progression of lung tissue loss in patients with severe AATD receiving human alpha1-PI (Prolastin(®)-C) versus placebo, using whole-lung computed tomography (CT) densitometry. STUDY DESIGN: SPARTA is a randomized, placebo-controlled trial assessing the efficacy and safety of two separate doses of Prolastin-C (60 and 120 mg/kg) administered weekly over 3 years in patients aged 18-70 years with a diagnosis of AATD and clinical evidence of pulmonary emphysema. The primary measure of efficacy (change from baseline whole-lung 15th percentile lung density [PD15]) will be determined by CT lung densitometry measured at total lung capacity. Secondary efficacy variables will be the evaluation of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations, as defined by American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society criteria, and PD15 of the basal lung region using CT densitometry. Adverse events will be collected and documented. CONCLUSIONS: The SPARTA trial is designed to evaluate the long-term (3-year) efficacy of 2 separate doses of Prolastin-C for the treatment of emphysema in patients with AATD. Protocol number: GTi1201. CLINICAL TRIALS IDENTIFIER: NCT01983241.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of 120 mg/kg versus 60 mg/kg weekly intravenous infusions of alpha-1 proteinase inhibitor in alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover study (SPARK).

Augmentation therapy with the approved dose of 60 mg/kg weekly intravenous (IV) alpha-1 proteinase inhibitor (alpha1-PI), achieves a trough serum level of 11 µM in individuals with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD), yet this is still below the level observed in healthy individuals. This study assessed the safety and pharmacokinetic profile of weekly infusions of a 120 mg/kg dose of alpha1-PI in 30 adults with AATD. Subjects with symptomatic, genetically determined (genotypes PI*ZZ, PI*Z(null), PI*(null)(null) or PI*(Z)Mmalton) AATD were randomly assigned to weekly infusions of 60 or 120 mg/kg alpha1-PI (Prolastin-C®) for 8 weeks before crossing over to the alternate dose for 8 weeks. Adverse events (AEs) (including exacerbations), vital signs, pulmonary function tests, and laboratory assessments were recorded. Pharmacokinetic measurements included AUC0-7days, Cmax, trough, tmax, and t1/2, based on serum alpha1-PI concentrations. In total for both treatments, 112 AEs were reported, with exacerbation of COPD being the most frequent, consistent with the subjects' diagnoses. Mean steady-state serum alpha1-PI concentrations following 120 mg/kg weekly IV alpha1-PI were higher than with the 60 mg/kg dose and mean trough concentrations were 27.7 versus 17.3 µM, respectively. Dose proportionality was demonstrated for AUC0-7days and Cmax, with low inter-subject variability. The 120 mg/kg alpha1-PI weekly dose was considered to be safe and well tolerated, and provided more favorable physiologic alpha1-PI serum levels than the currently recommended 60 mg/kg dose. The effect of this dosing regimen on slowing and/or preventing emphysema progression in subjects with AATD warrants further investigation.